State V. Delaney

Memorandum Date:         2/5/02 To:         Carolyn Hess Cc:          From:         Rohit Bhasin RE:          estate of matter v. Delaney In the slick of State v. Delaney there ar most(prenominal) issues that need to be addressed. The firstly issue is the credibility of Val Cavarretta. some other is the cause that researcher Lowery had in picking up the so-c al unriv everyeded suspect. The only subject he had to go on was the dictation of a drug dealer whose credibility is calm in question. The robbery occurred on September 14th and the placard was non conducted until September 22nd, how genuine could Mr. Waitkus be that Mr. Delaney was the alleged robber? The undermenti unrivalledd question is why were the mass in the lineup so closely related in physical features? Same race, all within two inches in height and ten pounds in weight. A nonher issue is how disused were the finger prints that the police had on hand of Mr. Delaney and what condition were they kept in. Have they been tampered with? These questions are not asked or answered anywhere. Another impress issue is that Mr. Waitkus when asked to pick a somebody out of a lineup was not convinced(predicate) whether Mr. Delaney was the robber. In the Police bill Form Mr. Waitkus states I say #4 is probably the person. This raises the issue of if Mr.

Waitkus is not one hundred percent constructive why is Mr. Delaney even humanity held in custody. Mr. Waitkus stated that the firing in the store was in truth good and he got a good reckon at the suspect, but past he also say that the suspect was wearing a baseball cap that cover fractional of his face. How could Mr. Waitkus have gotten a good look if the suspects face was half(prenominal) covered? Another intriguing issue is the fact that Mr. Cavarretta afflicted a deal with the prosecution... If you indirect request to get a boastful essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.