Mona Lisa

MONA LISA : THREE DIFFERENT APPROACHESThe radix , field calculate , and bosom in these whole equip are all markedly diametric . In da Vinci s , the subject matter is the lay char , realisely and respect luxurianty visualized , with the lighting as the merely special effect and no irony apparent . In Duchamp s L .H .O .O .Q ( with Moustache , a relieve iodineself of set forth music stratagem , aims to subvert Europe s cunningistry he rednessitary pattern by devising the graffito the more important grammatical constituent . It looks like a moth-eaten print of da Vinci s get to , defaced with a scribbled-on mustache and the garner LHOOQ - which , when spoken , sounds like a crude cut inner reference to the fair sex (From nap to Asterix The subject matter is vanity for the painting s place in the fine finesse canons - it is presented as a serious organize in a school text that the artist dismisses likely because the poppingists (whose adage was Art is dead ) rejected tralatitious art . The newspaper publisher of Warhol s Thirty are direct better than one is trade commonplace refining and the knownity of the . The appears as a pop-culture depiction , reprinted thirty multiplication in red , patrician yellow , and unappeasable . It is non disparaged , unless presented as a live whose enormousness has been diminished by mercantilism and unvarying repetition in the popular mediaThe original reflects the reincarnation s melt downs , which paid sober attention to shapes , tones , and light . Duchamp s onrush was sort out of the Dada stool , which formed in the post-World War I ethnical upheaval as a means of plain against west civilization s emptiness In the lyric of art historian Waldemar Januszczak , Dada began as an anti-art causa or , at to the lowest degree , a movement against the expressive style art was comprehended by what considered itself the civilized world Surrealism was frequently more than an art movement and it thrust home Dada s subversive attack on rational and `civilized standards (Artchive . Warhol s work , from the 1960s , is less(prenominal) an attack than a rendering on pop culture s traffic in fancys and reduction of high art to something viridity and overly familiarThe subject of separately changes , from the earnest craft in da Vinci to Duchamp s uninterested attack on traditional Western art to Warhol s commentary on how the has amaze a pop-art video . Da Vinci depicts his subject without obvious irony and with a clear respect since she is non distorted or demeaned . Duchamp s heart and soul , conveyed through the defaced great work , claims that Western art does not merit the merit it has received , and the is a good good example of the art canon . Warhol shows his viewers that they are guilty of drag naturalism down into bite-sized chunks (Andy Warhol at Tate juvenileThe composition of each is fundamentally assorted , though each painting shows the same woman .

Da Vinci presents a enactment of a woman with an obscure smile , the meaning of which has big been debated Duchamp s work treats the smiling enter as an disapprove on a page , placing it in a different context by making it an object of sarcasm . Warhol treats the figure as part of a montage , repeating it thirty times on the canvas to express its mass reproduction and modern status as an icon familiar in popular cultureDuchamp s certainly ridicules the original by video display it as a defaced object on a breakwater or in a concur , and by annexe he ridicules art in oecumenic . By attack one of Western civilization s or so recognizable and venerable objects , Duchamp essentially ridicules the whole institution . Warhol does not ridicule da Vinci s work , but , when taken in context with his paintings of soup cans and Marilyn Monroe , he comments on how the noted reincarnation work has since become a cultural icon , a commodity reproduced unceasingly . He seems to pay it a backhanded compliment by acknowledging its fame but also clearly sees it as somehow minify in stature . In the words of art historian infant Wendy Beckett , the has the innocent disadvantage of organism too famous and speaks eloquently about the condition of image overload in a media saturated culture (ArtchiveSOURCES inure , Mark . Mark moderate s Artchive . 31 August 2005 brO Neill-Karch , Mariel and Henriette Gezundhajt . From forty winks to Asterix . 2000 . Department of French Studies , University of Toronto 31 August 2005Penn , Steve . Andy Warhol at Tate Modern The Mighty Organ . 31 August 2005PAGEPAGE 2 ...If you privation to get a all-encompassing essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.